"let us not tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks on September 11th"

G.W.Bush

 

_________________

  •  Space: America's New War Zone
    • US Domination of Space
    • Administration Researches Laser Weapon
  •  The Current War Zone
    • 9/11: A False-Flag Terrorist Attack
    • The 7/7 London Bombings - A Ludicrous Diversion
  •  Manipulating Public Perception
    • The Power of Nightmares
    • Spinning Terror Post 9/11
  •  An Historical Precident
    • A History of False Flag Terrorism
    • Invasion of Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran and Sumer
    • US Neocons War Against Iran
  • Shaping The Future
    • The Report From Iron Mountain
    • Globalization and The War on Terror
  •  "Take A Bow" by Muse

_________________

Space: America's New War Zone

The Bush Administrations Aggressive Claim to Dominate Space - The Independent 19/10/2006

Space: Americas new war zoneThe Bush administration has staked an aggressive new claim to dominate space - rejecting any new treaties that seek to limit the United States' extraterrestrial activities and warning that it will oppose any nations that try to get in its way. A new policy recently signed by President George Bush, asserts that his country has the right to conduct whatever research, development and "other activities" in space that it deems necessary for its own national interests.

Read the article here

Administration Researches Laser Weapon  – New York Times 03 May 2006

The Bush administration is seeking to develop a powerful ground-based laser weapon that would use beams of concentrated light to destroy enemy satellites in orbit. The largely secret project, parts of which have been made public through Air Force budget documents submitted to Congress in February, is part of a wide-ranging effort to develop space weapons, both defensive and offensive. No treaty or law forbids such work. The White House has recently sought to play down the issue of space arms, fearing it could become an election-year liability.

Read the article here

 

 

_________________

The Current War Zone - The War on Terror

_________________

911: A False Flag Terrorist Attack

Loose Change, 2nd Edition - A Louder Than Words Film

_________________

7/7 London Bombings - A Ludicrous Diversion

A "Ludicrous Diversion". Thats how British Prime Minister Tony Blair described the Independant Public Inquiry called for by families of the victims of London bombings and by representatives of the Muslim community - who are now facing increased descrimination and racism as a result of the alleged suicide bombings in London on July 7th, 2005.

The mainstream news has wilfully spread false, unsubstantiated and unverifiable information, while choosing to completely ignore the numerous inconsistencies and discrepancies in the official story. The government has finally, after a year, presented us with their official ‘narrative’ concerning the event. Within hours it was shown to contain numerous errors, a fact since admitted by the Home Secretary John Reid. They have continuously rejected calls for a full, independent public inquiry. A ‘ludicrous diversion’. What don’t they want us to find out?

Video Link Watch the film here

_________________

Manipulating Public Perception

_________________

The Power of Nightmares - BBC Documentary

The Film US TV Networks Dare Not Show - Read the Guardian News article

"In the past our politicians offered us dreams of a better world. Now they promise to protect us from nightmares. The most frightening of these is the threat of an international terror network. But just as the dreams were not true, neither are these nightmares. In a new series, the Power of Nightmares explores how the idea that we are threatened by a hidden and organised terrorist network is an illusion. It is a myth that has spread unquestioned through politics, the security services and the international media...."

 

Part I: Baby It's Cold Outside




Part II: The Phantom Victory



Part III: The Shadows In The Cave

 

 

_________________

Spinning Terror Post 9/11

British Channel 4 Documentary: with Britain [allegedly] facing the greatest terrorist threat in our history, the nation trusts the government to devise policies to protect the nation. But Dispatches reporter Peter Osborne reveals that our trust may be misplaced. He presents the case that Tony Blair and the British government have reacted to the London bombings by rushing through anti-terror policies motivated by the desire to ward off tabloid criticism, gain electoral advantage and make the government look strong.

 

_________________

An Historical Precident

_________________

A History of False-Flag State Sponsored Terrorism

Terrorstorm - A Film by Alex Jones

 

_________________

Invasion of Afghanistan, Iraq and Sumer

War On Terror - Invasion of Iraq (Babylon, Mesopotamia and Sumer)

Leaked Memo Proves Bush Lied About Iraq

"An explosive memo sent to Britain’s prime minister and others by a former foreign policy aide clearly shows President Bush “doctored” intelligence reports prior to the Iraqi invasion in order to justify war based on weapons of mass destruction."

Read the American Free Press article

Leaked Report Rejects Iraqi al-Qaeda Link

"There are no current links between the Iraqi regime and the al-Qaeda network, according to an official British intelligence report seen by BBC News" reported the BBC in February 2003 - six weeks before the invasion of Iraq. "The classified document, written by defence intelligence staff three weeks ago, says there has been contact between the two in the past. But it assessed that any fledgling relationship foundered due to mistrust and incompatible ideologies."

Read the BBC News article

George Galloway Launches a Blistering Attack at the US Senate

British MP, George Galloway, let loose with all guns blazing when he came before a US Senate committee that accused him of profiting from the UN's Oil for Food Programme in Iraq. Dismissing the committee's documentary evidence against him as a fake, he then attacked the US policy on Iraq and the puppet regime it had installed there. Commentators described how rare it was for such blunt language to be used in the Senate. CNN's Wolf Blitzer described the British MP's evidence as "a blistering attack on US senators rarely heard" in the seat of American power.

video icon Watch the BBC News Video

US Interrogator Talks Openly About Abu Ghraib - Sky News 25/10/2006

video icon Watch the Interview Here

_________________

US Neocons War Against Iran

The Iranian Nuclear Issue

Thirty years after the neocons Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz supplied Iran with Nuclear Technology from the United States the Bush Administration builds it's case for war against a third middle-eastern nation since 9/11. The Iranian Government claimed they only want to enrich Uranium for the Nuclear Energy production. Channel 4 News headed to Tehran to cover the story.

Video Watch British Channel 4 News Video

 

US Neocons Supplied Nuclear Technology to Iran - Cheney, Rumsfeld & Wolfowitz behind Iran Nuclear Program initiated during Ford Administration

"In 1976, President Gerald R. Ford signed a directive that granted Iran the opportunity to purchase U.S. built reprocessing equipment and facilities designed to extract plutonium from nuclear reactor fuel. When Gerald Ford assumed the Presidency in August 1974, the current Vice President of the United States, Richard B Cheney served on the transition team and later as Deputy Assistant to the President. In November 1975, he was named Assistant to the President and White House Chief of Staff, a position he held throughout the remainder of the Ford Administration. In August 1974, the current Secretary of Defense, Donald H. Rumsfeld served as Chairman of the transition to the Presidency of Gerald R. Ford. He then became Chief of Staff of the White House and a member of the President's Cabinet (1974-1975) and was the Ford Administration’s Secretary of Defense from 1975–1977. The current President of the World Bank, Paul Wolfowitz served in the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency under President Gerald Ford. Wolfowitz is considered as a prominent architect of the Bush Doctrine, which has come to be identified with a policy that permits pre-emptive war against potential aggressors before they are capable of mounting attacks against the United States".

Read the article here

 

Operation Bite - April 6 [2007] Sneak Attack By US Forces On Iran Planned

[note - this story broke at the same time as British Sailors were taken hostage by Iran in March 2007. The Iranians insisted that the British vessel was trespassing in Iranian waters while, of course, the British and US claimed it was in Iraqi waters. The story of the 15 "kidnapped" sailors was constantly in the British media in this period with Official British Government figures claiming a diplomatic solution may not be possible. Iran released the prisoners on Wednesday April 4th 2007 and with a annoucement that the act was inthe name of peace.]

  • Russian Military Sources Warning
  • General Ivashov Calls For Emergency Session Of UN Security Council To Ward Off Looming US Aggression

By Webster G. Tarpley 25 March 2007

WASHINGTON DC -- The long awaited US military attack on Iran is now on track for the first week of April, specifically for 4 AM on April 6, the Good Friday opening of Easter weekend, writes the well-known Russian journalist Andrei Uglanov in the Moscow weekly "Argumenty Nedeli." Uglanov cites Russian military experts close to the Russian General Staff for his account.

Read the article here

 

US and Britains War Against Iran Is Already Underway

"The US and Britain are already at war with Iran, have been at war with Iran for a number of years now and are funding anti-Iranian terrorist groups inside Iran in preparation for the fallout that will occur after overt military action is commenced. Not my words, the words of high ranking CIA officials, Defense department officials, former UN officials and retired US air force Colonels. Iran's state news agency, IRNA today listed five previous violations of Iranian territory by British armed forces:

June 2004 - an unmanned reconnaissance plane violated Iranian airspace in northeastern Abadan and was hit by Iranian anti-aircraft guns; June 22, 2004 - Eight navy personnel in three speed boats entered Iranian territorial waters and were arrested by Iranian coast guards - the arrested were released after three days; November 1, 2006 - two helicopters, hovering at a height of 150 meters (492 feet), violated Iranian airspace for a total of 10 minutes; January 27, 2007 - a helicopter violated Iranian airspace over the mouth of the Arvand river and left the area after a warning from Iranian coast guards; February 28, 2007 - three navy boats entered Iranian territorial waters in the mouth of Khor Mousa.

Read the article here

 

 

_________________

Shaping The Future

_________________

The Report From Iron Mountain

Report from Iron MountainWidely regarded as a satirical hoax, the book "Report From Iron Mountain" caused controversy on its publication in October 16th, 1967. President Johnson supposedly "hit the roof" when he learned of it and panicked government officials sent cables to U.S. embassies throughout the world instructing them to play down public discussion of the report, and to emphasize that the report had nothing at all to do with official U.S. policy.

This book was - or so claimed the introduction - a report compiled by 15 experts of a Special Study Group which had been formed by the United States government.

This Special Study Group had first met in 1963 at a secret "underground nuclear hideout" called Iron Mountain. They had then held periodic meetings during the next two and a half years to discuss the problems that would confront the United States if it entered into a period of permanent peace. According to Lewin, one of the experts ("John Doe") who was identified as a professor of social science at a 'large Middle Western University,' had decided to release the report to the public.

The report, in language full of think-tank jargon, documented the conclusions of the Special Study Group concerning whether peace was possible, given the economic condition of the world. The group decided that peace "would almost certainly not be in the best interest of stable society." War, they argued, was simply too important a part of the world economy, and therefore it was necessary to continue a state of war indefinitely:

"War has provided both ancient and modern societies with a dependable system for stabilizing and controlling national economies. No alternate method of control has yet been tested in a complex modern economy that has shown itself remotely comparable in scope or effectiveness."

The report also concluded that the authority of the government over the people was born out of its ability to wage war and thus, without war the government might cease to exist: "'war' is virtually synonymous with nationhood. The elimination of war implies the inevitable elimination of national sovereignty and the traditional nation-state."

Report From Iron Mountain ConclusionsThe report included a number of recommendations that the government should follow just in case peace did break out. For instance, it suggested that a number of expensive institutions be created that would mimic the economic function of a war, such as: "(a) A comprehensive social-welfare program, directed toward maximum improvement of general conditions of human life. (b) A giant open-end space research program, aimed at unreachable targets. (c) A permanent, ritualized, ultra-elaborate disarmament inspection system, and variant of such a system."

The report also recommended that the government invent "alternate enemies." For instance, it could mobilize the population by scaring them with reports of extraterrestrial threats, massive global environmental pollution, or "an omnipresent, virtually omnipotent international police force." Alternatively, the population could be roused by "socially oriented blood games" done "in the manner of the Spanish Inquisition and the witch trials of other periods."

Read the Report From Iron Mountain

_________________

Globalisation and the War on Terror - The Pentagon New Map

"Since the end of the cold war, the United States has been trying to come up with an operating theory of the world — and a military strategy to accompany it. Now there’s a leading contender. It involves identifying the problem parts of the world and aggressively shrinking them. Since September 11, 2001, [Thomas Barnett], a professor of warfare analysis, has been advising the Office of the Secretary of Defense and giving this briefing continually at the Pentagon and in the intelligence community."

Video Link Watch Part 1 of the Presentation Here (duration 40.53)

Video Link Watch Part 2 of the Presentation Here (duration 39.16)

Video Link Watch Part 3 of the Presentation Here (duration 40.13)

Video Link Watch Part 4 of the Presentation Here (duration 41.54)

 

_________________

"Take A Bow" by Muse - Music Video

From the album "Black Holes & Revelations" 2006.

_________________


Warning: include(scripts/page_footer.html) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/ambants7/public_html/war.php on line 312

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening 'scripts/page_footer.html' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/ambants7/public_html/war.php on line 312

Warning: include(scripts/google_ads.html) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/ambants7/public_html/war.php on line 313

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening 'scripts/google_ads.html' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/ambants7/public_html/war.php on line 313